crime+scene+script

My name is Detective Hannah. Two weeks ago I was called to a crime scene at a 2 bedroom 1 bath beach house. The alleged victim was Felix Navidad. Felix's parent died in a freak bungee jump accident less than a year ago and he inherited a lot of money and put his closest friends in his will. The suspect guilty of committing this crime is Kendra Goode. This suspect's guilt was confirmed through the testing and results of evidence collected at the crime scene.

The most incriminating piece of evidence was the finger prints on Felix's cup. The evidence was found next to Felix's lifeless body. The test performed was a Fingerprint. The results of the test were that Kendra's finger prints were on his cup as well as his own. This connects the suspect to the crime because i compared an unknown set of fingerprints to the suspects and matched them to Kendra, which tells me that she handled Felix's cup.

The next piece of evidence collected was the pop. It was found in his cup.The test performed was a PH. The results of the test were that ragular Cola is an acid, while felix's was a base. This connects the suspect to the crime because Kendra made ice and there was a white powder on the ice cube tray and Kendra's shoe so se might have done something to the ice cubes.

The last piece of evidence collected was white powder. It was found on Kendra's tennis shoe and on the ice cube tray. The test performed was a powder test. The results of the test were that it turns black when you add two drops of iodine. This connects the suspect to the crime because the powder was on Kendra's shoe. (What about the Ph test on the ice cube tray?)

According to the evidence, the following is an account of the events believed to have gone down on that fateful day. Felix threw a house-warming party. Kendra went upstairs to take a shower at about 2:30. then she heard a wonmans voice downstairs and she came downstairs at about 3:00, when Alfredo called.( This is supposed to be a step-bystep explaination of how she got the poison in the drink and set Felix up for murder.)

Therefore, Kendra Goode committed the crime of murder for the money she has in Felix's will.

**Rubric for Podcasts** introduction. Provides relevant information and establishes a clear purpose engaging the listener immediately. || Describes the topic and engages the audience as the introduction proceeds. || Somewhat engaging (covers well-known topic), and provides a vague purpose. || __** Irrelevant or inappropriate topic that minimally engages listener. Does not include an introduction or the purpose is vague and unclear. **__ Missing intro on Podcast ||^  || 75% ||
 * ** CATEGORY ** || ** Exemplary **  || ** Proficient **  || ** Partially Proficient **  || ** Incomplete **  || ** POINTS **  ||
 * ** Introduction ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || Catchy and clever
 * ^  || Tells who is speaking, date the podcast was produced, and where the speaker is located.  || Tells most of the following: who is speaking, date of the podcast, and location of speaker.  || Alludes to who is speaking, date of the podcast, and location of speaker.  || **__ Speaker is not identified. No production date or location of the speaker is provided.  __** ||^   ||
 * ** Content ** || ** 6 points ** || ** 4 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || __**The motive was detailed and clearly based on information delivered throughout the investigation.**__  || The motive is detailed and based on partial information delivered throughout the investigation.  || The motive is not very detailed and is sprinkled with inaccurate information.  || The motive is missing, or unclear or all information is inaccurate.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || Four pieces of strong evidence were presented and linked to the suspect in an organized, methodical manner.  || __** Three or four pieces of evidence were presented and/or linked to the suspect in a somewhat organized, thoughtful manner.  **__ || Two pieces of shaky evidence were presented and/or loosely linked to the suspect. Lack of organization.  || One to no pieces of unimportant evidence were presented in an unorganized manner.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || The events in the scenario are detailed, extremely organized and strongly supported with evidence and facts related to the crime scene.  || The events in the scenario are well organized, somewhat detailed, and supported with evidence from the crime scene. || __**The events in the crime scene lack organization, detail, and are weakly supported with evidence from the crime scene.**__ || There was no clear direction and evidence was unimportant. ||^   ||
 * ^  || Conclusion clearly summarizes key information.  || __**Conclusion summarizes information.**__  || Conclusion vaguely summarizes key information  || No conclusion is provided.  ||^   ||
 * ** Delivery ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 point ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || **__Well rehearsed, smooth delivery in a conversational style.__**  || Rehearsed, smooth delivery.  || Appears unrehearsed with uneven delivery.  || Delivery is hesitant, and choppy and sounds like the presenter is reading.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__Highly effective enunciation and presenter's speech is clear and intelligible, not distant and muddled. Expression, and rhythm keep the audience listening.__** || Enunciation, expression, pacing are effective throughout the podcast.  || Enunciation, expression, rhythm are sometimes distracting during the podcast.  || Enunciation of spoken word is distant and muddled and not clear. Expression and rhythm are distracting throughout the podcast.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__Correct grammar is used throughout the podcast.__**  || Correct grammar is used during most of the podcast.  || Occasionally incorrect grammar is used during the podcast.  || Poor grammar is used throughout the podcast.  ||^   ||
 * ** Graphic and Music Enhancements ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || **__Music enhances the mood, quality, and understanding of the presentation.__**  || Music provides supportive background to the podcast.  || Music provides somewhat distracting background to the podcast.  || Music is distracting to presentation.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__ All music enhancements are owned by the creator of the podcast or copyright cleared with appropriate documentation.  __** || Music enhancements are owned by the creator of the podcast or copyright cleared.  || Use of copyrighted works is questionable.  || Copyright infringement is obvious.  ||^   ||
 * ** Technical Production ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || **__Presentation is recorded in a quiet environment without background noise and distractions.__**  || Presentation is recorded in a quiet environment with minimal background noise and distractions.  || Presentation is recorded in a semi-quiet environment with some background noise and distractions.  || Presentation is recorded in a noisy environment with constant background noise and distractions.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__ Transitions are smooth and spaced correctly without noisy, dead space.  __** || Transitions are smooth with a minimal amount of ambient noise.  || Transitions are uneven with inconsistent spacing; ambient noise is present.  || Transitions are abrupt and background noise needs to be filtered.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__Volume of voice, music, and effects enhance the presentation.__**  || Volume is acceptable.  || Volume is occasionally inconsistent.  || Volume changes are highly distracting.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__ Podcast length keeps the audience interested and engaged.  __** || Podcast length keeps audience listening.  || Podcast length is somewhat long or somewhat short to keep audience engaged.  || Podcast is either too long or too short to keep the audience engaged.  ||^   ||
 * ** TOTAL POINTS ** || 43/57